top of page
Source: Netflix.  ‘Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery’
Source: Netflix. ‘Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery’

US streamer spending on European original content increased by 42% in 2024 to hit €8.5bn, according to research by the European Audiovisual Observatory (EAO).

The EAO report said Netflix, Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video each spent over €2bn on original European content last year, while Apple TV+ accounted for €600m and HBO Max for €500m.



The report spans the wider Europe area, including the UK, but excludes Russia.

In total, global streamers accounted for 34% of all spending on European original content excluding news, sport and acquired film and TV shows.

 

However, the streamer spend is highly concentrated in Europe: the UK and Spain together accounted for 58% of their spend in original European content.

The streamers spent €2.9bn in the UK on original content last year and €2bn in Spain.

Next up was France and Italy which each saw a spend of €0.8bn, followed by Germany (€0.7bn) and Sweden (€0.3bn).


Scripted programming accounted for the lion’s share of global streamer spend, although unscripted programming spend also increased.


Among scripted content, series accounted for about 90% of global streamer spend compared to 10% for films. Netflix film Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery, as well as Apple’s Slow Horses and HBO’s The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon are among projects to shoot in Europe last year.


The research concluded total spending on European original works by streamers, public and private broadcasters - excluding news, sports rights and acquisitions - amounted to €25.1bn in 2024, up from €22.6bn the year before.


Traditional broadcaster spending still accounted for the majority of investment - €16.7bn - in original content, but it is growing at a slower pace than the streamers.

Private broadcasters were the biggest investors in European original content in 2024, spending a combined €8.8bn.


Public broadcasters together invested €7.9bn in European original content in 2024.

The UK recorded the lion’s share of total spend - €7.3bn - followed by Germany (€4.5bn) and France (€3.3bn).

 
 

By Mona Tabbara, Screen Daily news 10 September 2025

UK secretary for the government’s Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) Lisa Nandy has called out the streamers and Banijay for not funding the UK’s burgeoning Creative Industries Standards Authority (CIISA).


More support for the exhibition sector and “frustrations” with AI legislation were also key talking points for Nandy’s first culture, media and sport committee grilling after retaining her post in the weekend’s cabinet reshuffle.


Nandy took aim at European production and distribution company Banijay and non-specific streamers for not providing the voluntary contribution needed to support the running of the industry-backed body.


“I’m having conversations with the streamers, who so far have been very reluctant to sign up to CIISA,” said Nandy. “I am also genuinely quite appalled at learning from CIISA that Banijay, the production company behind recent headlines [in reference to scandals surrounding the behaviour of Masterchef UK hosts, Gregg Wallace and John Torode], had committed to sign up to CIISA and has not yet signed up to funding.


”If that has changed in the few hours since we’ve been here, I’d be delighted to hear it. But we do take a very dim view of companies that have had these issues, that have been heavily criticised for not having dealt with them, and have not made good on those commitments.”


A spokesperon for Banijay told Screen in response: “Banijay UK has made it very clear that it is supportive of CIISA and welcomes the concept of an independent body that sets standards for behaviour and addresses issues in the industry. We’ve embraced their standards framework and have engaged with the secretary of state’s office and officials at DCMS as well as directly with CIISA.


“We have offered to help fund CIISA during its development phase and continue to collaborate closely with CIISA. CIISA have insisted that they will only countenance full annualised funding. Together with several other large production groups and studios, we will continue these conversations and look forward to helping develop and define CIISA’s remit.”


No organisation is expected to contribute more than 0.1% of annual UK turnover to CIISA. Nandy reiterated that she is not ruling out government intervention if the industry does not financially commit to CIISA.


“I’ve had these discussions extensively with CIISA, which we strongly support as a voluntary initiative,” she said. “I have made it clear that if in the future we believe it’s necessary for this to become statutory, that is something that the government is very open to.”


Nandy commended the BBC “who have shown a real leadership role in this”.

She added that the culture department and CIISA agree that the standards body will “be more effective if we can persuade a wider range of organisations to sign up [to funding]”.


AI “frustrations”

Nandy rowed back on the government’s previous stance on AI and copyright. The government has embarked on a series of cross-industry consultations and roundtables on the issue of AI and copyright, beginning in December 2024. Its initial preferred option was an opt-out model, in which copyright owners must proactively opt out of their work being used for training AI models.


She said: “We’ve learned through that consultation process that having a preferred model was not the right approach, and that is no longer our position. We do not have a preferred option.”


In June, the UK’s Data (Use and Access) Bill passed through parliament, following much pushback in the House of Lords, the UK’s second chamber. The bill was passed without the protections for creatives that key industry figures and their House of Lords backers were hoping to secure.


The bill was introduced by the government in October of last year and covers a range of data regulations with an aim to “unlock the secure and effective use of data for the public interest, without adding pressures to the country’s finances”.


The sticking point for the creative industries was the fear that it would allow tech companies to train AI on copyrighted material without the consent of the rights holder. The government said it was carrying out additional consultation about copyright.

“AI offers enormous opportunities, but it also offers huge threats,” noted Nandy. “The debate has become very binary – you’re either pro-AI, or pro-creative industries. My view has always been that the UK’s great strength, our superpower is the data, the human data, and content produced by the creative industries. If we don’t protect the creative industries, we haven’t got a hope of being an AI superpower.


“I don’t think as a government that we did enough collectively, and I take full responsibility for this, to be clear enough about that, and I think we allowed the debate to become very binary. You’re either for creative industries or for AI.


“We had deliberately tried to separate out the legislation we were passing in this area from the particular issue of AI and copyright. I don’t think that worked.”


She continued, “I haven’t said this before publicly, but one of my great frustrations with that is because it was a DSIT [Department for Science, Innovation and Technology]-led bill, I was not able to be as present in the debate in parliament as my counterpart and friend [DSIT secretary of state] Peter Kyle. It became a debate that was very much about AI, where the creative industries needed to see that their secretary of state was also very visible, and the parliamentary process and the rules didn’t allow for that.”


Pressed on when the public can expect to see the results of the AI consultations and roundtables, which has had around 11,500 responses, Nandy refused to commit to a timeframe.


“We know it’s urgent,” she said, but avoided questions on whether it could be by the end of this calendar year, or financial year.


UK cinema support

Nandy also used the platform to throw her weight behind supporting UK cinemas. “We’ve been looking at investment in film infrastructure, and particularly around cinemas, which are often the only cultural institution in many parts of the country… We’re looking at what we can do potentially to ensure that cinemas, and especially independent cinemas, are seen as critical cultural infrastructure and eligible for the funding that other cultural institutions are eligible for.”


The UK exhibition sector has been calling for a cut to VAT on cinema tickets, akin to the temporary 5% rate during the pandemic.


Currently, admission charges to museums, galleries, art exhibitions and zoos, plus theatrical, musical or choreographic performances ‘of a cultural nature’ qualify for exemption from VAT on admission charges.


However, the government appeared to rule out adding cinemas to this list in its response to the CMS committee’s inquiry into British film and high-end TV earlier this year. “VAT reliefs can add complexity and administrative cost to the tax system and create opportunities for non-compliance,” the government said at the time.



 
 

Freelance film maker Alister Chapman has

worked in film and television for over 35 years, starting in motorsports, including Formula 1 and the World Rally Championship before spending over 20 years making documentaries and producing corporate videos. He has worked on documentaries for National Geographic, the BBC, Discovery and the military. Additionally, he worked for several different news agencies where he would frequently be asked to travel last minute to shoot interviews or news stories in all sorts of locations as a lighting cameraman. 


More recently he has worked on Hollywood blockbuster movies.


With his knowledge, he became a go-to person for Education seminars and launched the websites tvcameraman.info and then XDCAM-USER.com, filled with guidance, tutorials and reviews on products that he has used. He is a highly regarded Sony Independent Certified Expert and Ambassador. Recently, he developed a series of online videos called “Lighting 101” which are available to the public.


Chapman’s “Lighting 101” tutorials include, “Why Do We Light?”, “The Basics of Three-Point Lighting,” “Hard Light vs. Soft Light,” and “Lighting for Online Content.”

In his series of videos, Chapman shows how you can increase or enhance the quality of your filmmaking through the use of a range of different lighting techniques.


Why Do We Light?

In “Why do We Light?”  he addresses the need for light, noting that all cameras need light. But lighting isn’t just about having enough light, it’s also about controlling what light there is to enhance the look of your shot.  

At the simplest level, this might be using a reflector to bounce light back at the subject in a situation where the light from behind is creating too much contrast. Utilizing an actress in a basic scenario, he shows how to light when shooting against a window. He introduces the use of reflectors for bounce, or using a black flag to reduce the light, creating a negative fill.

Chapman explains the benefits and necessity of good lighting, even over a better camera or lens, because beautifully lit footage shot with a lesser quality camera will always look better than poorly lit footage shot with a great camera. Choosing the right lights and learning how to use them is key.


The Basics of Three-Point Lighting

In “The Basics of Three-Point Lighting,” Chapman explains that while it may seem like a very simple old school technique, it’s an easy-to-understand starting point that can be adapted to suit a wide range of situations and delivers consistently good results. 

The concept of three-point lighting uses three fixtures: key light, fill light and back light (also known as a rim, or hair, light). These can be the same three lights, or three different fixtures.


In this video, he uses a simple scenario and starts with the key light, which is the main source of light. Some things to consider when setting up the key light is illumination of the subject, framing, and how this interacts with any other major source of light in the scene.


The next light is the fill light, which he uses to fill some of the shadows created by the key light. Generally, a hard light or a small soft light is used for the fill light and it’s usually placed on the other side of the camera to the key light. A carefully placed fill light will often create a pleasing glint in an interviewee’s eyes, what is referred to as a catch light.  


An alternative to hard light for the fill light that works very well is a tube light like a PavoTube. The last light added is the backlight, which is used to add separation between the foreground and background. Chapman likes to then turn them all off and bring each one on individually so you can see what each light is doing


By learning how to understand the basics of three-point lighting, and how these three lights affect a scene and interact with each other, you can create a wide range of different looks and a solid foundation to build on. Experimenting with light placement and mixing the lights is key. 


Hard Light vs Soft Light

In “Hard Light vs Soft Light,” Chapman explains the fundamental concepts of video and film lighting and the difference between soft light and hard light. He covers each kind of lighting and how it affects the images you create. Throughout the video, he touches on a range of different lighting fixtures including panel lights, cob (chip on board) lights and lighting modifiers such as soft boxes, diffusion and Fresnel lens.


In defining the two kinds of light, he explains that hard light leads to crisp, sharp and well-defined shadows where the light transitions rapidly from light to dark and the light creates a hard shadow edge.

By contrast, soft light is where the shadows are less distinct, the shadow’s edge is smoother and the light falls away to dark more gently. He addresses how the reflection of light, intensity and contrast, as well as distance between the light source and the subject can produce both hard and soft light. 


He demonstrates how a large panel light like the Nanlite PavoSlim 120C can produce soft shadows when its relatively close to the subject, but when moved further away the light becomes harder and there is less wraparound effect. 


Using the Nanlite Forza 60C, the FC-120B with a reflector, and the FC-500C with a Fresnel lens and barn doors, he illustrates how all three of these lights can be hard lights, with or without their attachments. 


Then he demonstrates how to turn those same lights into soft lights, using some attachments such as Softboxes or reflectors and how this compares to a panel light such as the PavoSlim 120C. The goal is always experimenting to get the best use out of the lights.


Lighting for Online Content

Appealing to a broader group of content creators, “Lighting for Online Content” was developed for podcasts, YouTube videos, and other online clips. A fairly typical setup is an influencer who is going to talk about product within a fairly small space, usually with lights already in place.



Chapman shows how a PavoSlim 120C panel attached to the ceiling can eliminates flicker and poor color temperature while producing a high-quality light. An alternative is using a light stand, which gives a nice flat light directly into the face of the influencer, while allowing the product to be shown on the desk. The idea is to light so you can see the influencer’s face, and the product as these are the two most important things.


Once again, Chapman explains how a Forza 60C with a projector lens, and a gobo, can jazz up the background. Referring back to the three-point lighting tutorial, he introduces a back light, as the key light has already been established. 



He walks the audience through various ways to light for a two-person interview as well, showing various ways to add texture to the shot with other tools. In this scenario, most television studios will have a key light for each presenter, angled so that the shadows don’t fall directly behind them.


Adding to the look for a more visually interesting set, a Nanlite PavoTube is used as an up-light to add wash on the wall behind. Because the PavoTubes are so small, they can be hidden behind chairs or other furniture, and then controlled via remote control. To complete the look, a backlight is set up, which adds a bit of glow and separates the interviewer from the background with the color wash. With various scenarios to choose from, Chapman gives a robust explanation of online content lighting.


▶ EXPO Notice - IBC Show 2025 

We are delighted to invite you to join us at IBC 2025, where Alister Chapman will deliver an insightful session at the Nanlite & Nanlux booth.


Topic: Portable Lighting for Mobile Documentary Production


📅 Sept 12 | 13:30–14:00, Sept 13 | 11:30–12:00, Sept 14 | 11:30–12:00

📍 Booth No.12.F21 | RAI Amsterdam

 
 
bottom of page